Legal Opinion

United States v. Douglas Cormack Welsch

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1971No. 653-70_1PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

The United States has taken this appeal from an order entered by the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico which granted the defendant’s motion to suppress certain evidence seized during the course of the defendant’s arrest. The motion was made prior to trial and was directed to a large number of pills or tablets which the Government asserts contained LSD or mescaline.

The record on this appeal shows that a special agent for the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, Amadeo Medina, posing as a prospective purchaser of drugs, had been in communication…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. RieweCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. United States v. ShareefCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Steven Eugene Smith, Randy Ray SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. In Re Special September 1978 Grand Jury (Ii). Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Glen HermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API