Legal Opinion

Dickey v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1925No. 8610. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, C. J.

This suit, as originally brought by appellee, was against Harris-Hahlo Company, a corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused plaintiff by the negligence of the defendant corporation, acting through its agent and employee, Mrs. Dickey, in dressing plaintiff’s hair by giving it what is known and designated as a “permanent wave.”

The defendant corporation answered by general demurrer and general denial, and especially denied that Mrs. Dickey or any of her employees were employed by Harris-I-Iahlo Company or that said company had any interest in or control…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. HattonTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Stevenson v. CaubleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Guffey v. MoseleyTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Maury v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DickeyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Stamper v. ScholtzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Dickey v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Dickey v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API