Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Dickey

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1926No. 787-4447PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The pleadings in this case are as recited in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in its statement (275 S. W. 310) ¿S follows:

“This suit, as originally brought by appellee, was against Harris-Hahlo Company, a corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused plaintiff by the negligence of the defendant corporation, acting through its agent and employee, Mrs. Dickey, in dressing plaintiff’s hair by giving it what is known and designated as a ‘permanent wave.’
“The defendant corporation answered by general demurrer and general denial, and especially denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. HattonTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Baldwin v. PoltiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  3. Nimmo v. O'KeeffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Dickey v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Seinsheimer v. BurkhartTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Campbell v. JohnsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Dickey v. JacksonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Freeman v. Texas Bread Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Levy v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API