Legal Opinion

Dickey v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 20, 1927No. 8610. [fn*]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit by appellee to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the appellant Mrs. Dickey in dressing appellee's hair with what is known and designated a "permanent wave." Harris-Hahlo Company, in whose store building the beauty parlor conducted by Mrs. Dickey was situated, was also made defendant, and judgment sought against that company.

Mrs. Dickey, joined by her husband, C. H. Dickey, answered by general demurrer and general denial to plaintiff's petition and to the cross-action of defendant Harris-Hahlo Company. They further pleaded…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DickeyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Hurd v. Texas Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Temple Lumber Co. v. LivingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Louisville & Interurban Railroad v. FrazeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dickey v. JacksonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Greer v. ThamanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API