Legal Opinion

State v. Smalls

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 28, 2005No. 0205-44742; A119943PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

This appeal from a conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) presents a single issue: If a driver arrested for DUII cannot afford a lawyer, must the state provide a lawyer to that person before requiring him or her to decide whether to take a breath test to determine blood alcohol content? The trial court determined that the constitutional right to counsel does not extend that far and, consequently, denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of his breath test results. For the reasons we describe below, we affirm.

The facts are straightforward and, as pertinent to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. SwanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Amended September 21, 2016 State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API