Legal Opinion

State v. Swan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 27, 2016No. 130242160; A154526PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAKAMOTO, J. pro tempore

This criminal appeal concerns the partial denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010 (Count 1), and reckless driving, ORS 811.140 (Count 2). Before trial, the court determined that a law enforcement officer impermissibly interrogated defendant without an attorney present, a violation of defendant’s right against self-incrimination under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution.1 As a result, the trial court suppressed some of defendant’s statements.

However, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SwanOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. BrandesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API