State v. Swan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
NAKAMOTO, J. pro tempore
This criminal appeal concerns the partial denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010 (Count 1), and reckless driving, ORS 811.140 (Count 2). Before trial, the court determined that a law enforcement officer impermissibly interrogated defendant without an attorney present, a violation of defendant’s right against self-incrimination under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution.1 As a result, the trial court suppressed some of defendant’s statements.
However, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SwanOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. BrandesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022