Legal Opinion

Carr v. Montgomery Ward & Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 14, 1963No. 49285PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLINGSWORTH, Judge.

Plaintiff, a former employee of defendant, brought this action to recover actual' damages in the sum of $5,000 and exemplary damages in the sum of $25,000, on grounds that, following her discharge as such employee, defendant, upon written, request made by plaintiff, unlawfully and maliciously refused to issue to her the so-called “service letter” required by § 290.140 RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. Attached to and made a part of her petition was-plaintiff’s Exhibit “A”, being the letter pleaded by plaintiff as the written request made by her for said “service letter”. Defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christy v. PetrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Brink's, Inc. v. Hoyt. Hoyt v. Brink's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. ACF Industries, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Van Sickle v. Katz Drug Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Worthington Drainage District v. Elm Township of Putnam CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dake v. TuellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Vicki Easley v. Empire Incorporated and Empiregas, Inc. Of WheatonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Rimmer v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
  4. Comerio v. Beatrice Foods Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984
  5. Russell D. Schilligo v. Purolator Courier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API