Legal Opinion

Thomas v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2003No. 00-2948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

YOHN, District Judge.

Louise D. Thomas, Dennis D. Darden, and Linda Jean Allen (collectively, “named plaintiffs”) bring this action on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated persons (collectively, “class members”) against SmithKline Beecham Corporation (“SKB”), various SKB employee benefit plans (“benefit plans”), and the administrators of those benefit plans (“administrators”) (collectively, “defendants” or “SKB”). The plaintiffs seek declaratory, equitable and legal relief establishing their rights to receive benefits from SKB under the Employee Retirement…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marcia Williams v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Evans v. SodexhoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Bamgbose v. Delta-T Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Keen v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Ensley v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API