Legal Opinion
Keen v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 30, 2007No. Civil Action 05-CV-4478, 05-CV-6211PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Before me are summary judgment motions in two cases relating to the allegedly unlawful denial of benefits to workers who performed services for General Electric Company and/or Lockheed Martin Corporation at aerospace facilities in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 1993, Martin Marietta Corporation purchased GE’s aerospace facilities, and in 1995, Martin Marietta merged with Lockheed Corporation and became known as Lockheed Martin (“Lockheed”). Defendants in both cases have moved for summary judgment on the statute of limitations.
Facts
The material facts…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bamgbose v. Delta-T Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Martin v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- CARR v. JEFFERSON DEFINED BENEFIT PLANDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Certain Underwriters of Lloyd's of London v. Koch CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- VOLZ v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023