Legal Opinion

Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 24, 1963No. 84PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Terry, J.:

In the fall of 1953, plaintiff conferred with an independent insurance agent who solicited life insurance for defendant and other companies to discuss insurance for his young children. Plaintiff testified that his desire was to secure term insurance during the minority of his children which would enable him to pay burial expenses if any of the children died during their early years. The agent in question advised plaintiff that no company sold term insurance for the age group in question but recommended a policy issued by the defendant company. Under the terms of the policy proposed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turner v. VineyardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
  2. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MadricSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  3. Miller v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. EJ Evans Company v. Ohio State Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Morgan Stivers v. National American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Meier v. New Jersey Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Celley v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1995
  5. Bill Brown Construction Co. v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API