Legal Opinion

Celley v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1974No. Appeal, No. 1219PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

This is an appeal from an order directing a verdict in favor of appellee, Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Association, on the basis of elimination endorse*478ments in two health and accident policies issued in 1956 to appellant, Albert J. Celley.

The policies provide for an aggregate payment of five hundred dollars per month during the period the insured suffers a “total loss of time,” i.e., when “the insured is able to perform none of his occupational duties, [and] receives no pay for performing work or service of any kind . . . .” In each policy there is an elimination…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mazzilli v. Acc. & Cas. Ins. Co. of WinterthurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Crawford v. Manhattan L. Ins. Co. of NYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Penn-Air, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Patton v. PattonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Frisch v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. Metzger v. Clifford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Canal Insurance Company v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API