Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Lee

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1877PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henderson county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

Since this case was previously before this court, the plaintiifLs declaration has been amended, and additional proofs introduced on the last trial.

The evidence shows that about the 10th of November, 1869, a collision occurred between an engine of appellant and the team and wagon of Darius B. Lee, whilst being driven by him on a highway crossing appellant’s railroad. Lee was killed by the collision, and his administratrix sues to recover for loss, under the provisions of the statute. On a trial in the court below, as on each of the previous trials, plaintiff recovered a verdict, and the court,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Haas v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hartman v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Chicago & Iowa Railroad v. LaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Moberly v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Hartley v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API