Legal Opinion

Carmody v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1886No. 12,531PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Niblack, C. J. —

This was an action by the State against Martin Carmody as principal in, and Christina ’Wehmeyer and Patrick Carmody as sureties upon, a forfeited recognizance.

Process was not served upon Martin Carmody, and there was no appearance by him to the action. The sureties answered in four paragraphs. Demurrers were sustained to all the paragraphs of answer, and, the sureties refusing to plead further, final judgment was rendered against them for the full penalty of the recognizance.

It is first claimed that the complaint was bad, and that, in consequence, the circuit court erred in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. State ex rel. ReadIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Gregory v. State ex rel. GudgelIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Harbaugh v. AlbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Gachenheimer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Votaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A., T. S. F. Rld. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. People v. RobbMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Cox & Cornell v. Peoria Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hiatt v. State ex rel. KitselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. State Ex Rel. Bartley v. Marion Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API