Legal Opinion

People v. Robb

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Berrien. (O’Hara, J.) Debt. Defendants William T. Robb, Brant, and Thomas bring error. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This' is an action on a recognizance of bail entered upon by defendants, conditioned for the appearance of Louis Robb at the March term, 1892, of the Berrien' circuit court, for trial on the charge of assault with intent to murder. Verdict for the plaintiff was rendered by direction of the court, and defendants appeal.

1. It appears that the recognizance was entered into before a circuit court commissioner, and recites that an examination had been had before a justice of the peace, and that it was made to appear that an offense had been committed, and that there was probable cause to believe…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daniels v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Champlain v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  3. West v. ColquittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Carmody v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. People v. MillisNew York Supreme Court · 1849

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. MagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. State v. FunkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People v. McCrackenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. In Re Surety BondMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. GlumbMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API