Legal Opinion

Schlick v. Comco Management, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1987No. G004870PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, J. *

—The Workers’ Compensation Act generally precludes an industrially injured employee from maintaining an action for damages against his employer or the employer’s insurer; the employee’s exclusive remedy is his right to workers’ compensation benefits under the jurisdiction of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. (Former Lab. Code, § 3601, now § 3602; 1 §§ 3850, subd. (b), 3852, 5300; Unruh v. Truck Insurance Exchange (1972) 7 Cal.3d 616 [102 Cal.Rptr. 815, 498 P.2d 1063].) In this appeal we decide whether an employee may bring a civil action against the independent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Renteria v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Everfield v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Hart v. National Mortgage & Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. CHARLES J. VACANTI v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Marsh & McLennan, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Jablonski v. Royal Globe InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Mottola v. R. L. Kautz & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Hernandez v. General Adjustment BureauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API