Schlick v. Comco Management, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, J. *
—The Workers’ Compensation Act generally precludes an industrially injured employee from maintaining an action for damages against his employer or the employer’s insurer; the employee’s exclusive remedy is his right to workers’ compensation benefits under the jurisdiction of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. (Former Lab. Code, § 3601, now § 3602; 1 §§ 3850, subd. (b), 3852, 5300; Unruh v. Truck Insurance Exchange (1972) 7 Cal.3d 616 [102 Cal.Rptr. 815, 498 P.2d 1063].) In this appeal we decide whether an employee may bring a civil action against the independent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Renteria v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Everfield v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Hart v. National Mortgage & Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- CHARLES J. VACANTI v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Marsh & McLennan, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Jablonski v. Royal Globe InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Mottola v. R. L. Kautz & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Hernandez v. General Adjustment BureauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.