Legal Opinion
HUSCHER v. Wells Fargo Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 2004No. B168103PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, J.
Scott A. Huscher appeals from the probate court order denying his petition to determine that he was a beneficiary of a family trust. We affirm that order.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
George B. Marx established a tmst in his name on June 8, 1983 (the Marx Trust or the Tmst). Among the named beneficiaries were his four step-grandchildren, including Scott A. Huscher. The tmst proceeds were to be distributed among the step-grandchildren after both Marx and his wife died. The Tmst provided that Marx, as trustor, “may at any time amend any of the terms of the tmst by an instrument in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Jimmy Johnson v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Cochran v. CochranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Ganyo v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Fletcher v. Children's Hospital Medical Center FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Masry v. MasryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- King v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Balistreri v. BalistreriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Cundall v. Mitchell-ClydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Estate of Jennings CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.