Meier v. American Maize-Products Co., Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION UPON REHEARING
SULLIVAN, Judge.
American Maize Products, et al. (collectively, AMP) has filed the present petition for rehearing based upon our opinion in Meier v. American Maize-Products, Inc. (1995) 2d Dist. Ind.App., 645 N.E.2d 662. We write in order to clarify our original decision.
In its petition for rehearing, AMP complains that this court's previous disposition was fundamentally flawed because we failed to take into account specific admissions made by the Water Pollution Control Board (Board) with regard to the fee scheme it established in the Final Rule. AMP argues that we…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Springfield Gas & Electric Co. v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Riggin v. Bd. of Trust. of Ball State Univ.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Wallace v. FeehanIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
- Metropolitan School District of Martinsville v. MasonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Indiana Environmental Management Board v. Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sullivan v. DayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Pompey v. PrynerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Carter v. City of East ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008