Legal Opinion
Pompey v. Pryner
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 20, 1996No. 49A02-9511-CV-656PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge
McKendall Pompey and Tractor Supply Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as the appellants) appeal the trial court's determination that it lacked jurisdiction to grant a petition for emergency and permanent protective orders which appellants filed against Vincent L. Pryner. The appellants present several issues for review, which we consolidate and restate as:
Did the trial court err in concluding that chapter 6, section 4 of the Indiana Anti-Injunction Act 1 deprived it of jurisdiction to issue restraining orders or temporary or permanent injunctions in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. McGill Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- MURRIN ETC. v. Cook Bros. Dairy, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956
- Cha v. WarnickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Miller v. BryantIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Fair Share Organization, Inc. v. MitnickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Economy Insurance Co. v. FeltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Nordman v. North Manchester Foundry, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Gordon v. GordonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Local Union No. 115 v. Indiana Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- A.H. v. C.E.G., on behalf of G.S.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014