Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rosling v. Seattle Building & Construction Trades Council

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1963No. 36725Published

1DissentFinley, J.

(dissenting)—In the instant case it seems to me that the respondents were mainly interested in injunc-tive relief, and that this, in effect, put the controversy on the so-called “equity side” of the court. However, the respondents also requested relief in damages and their costs. The trial court granted equitable relief and awarded damages plus costs. The majority, emphasizing the equity aspects, speaks of this lawsuit as being moot and cites cases of this court relative to dismissal of appeals in such instances. The majority opinion states:

*909“If the construction work on the particular project…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bradley v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Bowen v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. National Ass'n of Creditors, Inc. v. GrassleyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Fox v. NachtsheimWashington Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API