Legal Opinion

Fox v. Nachtsheim

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1892No. 345PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court, Pierce County. Action by John H. Fox, T. J. McGovern and Lott Farr, partners doing business as Fox & Co., against F. Nachtsheim and J. Klee, partners, and T. F. Leader & Co. and Laumeister & Tod, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on the premises of Nachtsheim & Klee for repairs made thereon at the instance of the other defendants, who were lessees thereof. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants Nachtsheim & Klee appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbab, J.

This appeal is taken from The judgment rendered in the superior court of Pierce county. Several errors are alleged, among others, that the judgment of the court below is erroneous and void, for the reason that the same was rendered on Sunday, a non-judicial day. Respondents move to dismiss the appeal for the following reasons: (1) That the proceeding is a civil action at law for the recovery of money, and the original amount in controversy does not exceed the sum of two hundred dollars, and does not involve the legality of a tax, impost,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. LohrWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. United States v. NourseSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Livermore v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Lynch v. DivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Moore v. WaitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1807

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Powell v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bennett v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Bowen v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Esmieu v. SchragCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Harrington v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API