Legal Opinion

Siefert v. Nationwide Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 1981No. 428PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellants contend that the lower court erred in concluding that a trail bike is not a “motor vehicle” as defined by the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act. 1 We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the court below.

On August 9, 1977, appellants’ minor son was injured when he was struck by a 1977 Honda trail bike while he was standing along the berm of a highway in Greensburg, Pennsylvania. The bike had neither headlights, taillights, nor a horn. Appellants instituted this action to recover basic loss benefits pursuant to an insurance policy issued to…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gallo v. J.C. Penney Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. EliasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Bills v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Pistorius v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Bindernagel v. Nationwide Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API