Siefert v. Nationwide Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellants contend that the lower court erred in concluding that a trail bike is not a “motor vehicle” as defined by the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act. 1 We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the court below.
On August 9, 1977, appellants’ minor son was injured when he was struck by a 1977 Honda trail bike while he was standing along the berm of a highway in Greensburg, Pennsylvania. The bike had neither headlights, taillights, nor a horn. Appellants instituted this action to recover basic loss benefits pursuant to an insurance policy issued to…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Gallo v. J.C. Penney Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. EliasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Bills v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Pistorius v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Bindernagel v. Nationwide Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.