Legal Opinion

State v. Dierks

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 30, 2014No. 110545450; A149290PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HADLOCK, J.,

In our original opinion in this case, we reversed a judgment that found defendant in contempt for having violated the terms of a no-contact order issued by a Washington court. State v. Dierks, 257 Or App 88, 90, 306 P3d 653 (2013) (Dierks I), vac’d and rem’d, 354 Or 837, 325 P3d 738 (2014) (.Dierks II). We did so after concluding that a police officer had “stopped” defendant without reasonable suspicion, in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, and that the trial court erred when it denied defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence that the officer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BackstrandOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. HighleyOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. DierksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. McKibbenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  4. State v. RudnitskyyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API