Carlton v. Carey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order, of the district court for St. Louis county, Dibell, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
For the third time this case appears in this court. Originally, the action was brought to cancel and set'aside a foreclosure proceeding based on a mortgage upon eighty acres of land belonging to the plaintiff. She was successful in the court below, but on appeal by defendant this court required ás a condition that she*233reconvey to defendant certain lots which had entered into the original transaction, and pay to him a certain amount of money. Carlton v. Hulett, 49 Minn. 308, 51 N. W. 1053. It afterwards appeared that plaintiff’s attorney in fact had conveyed certain of the lots mentioned, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Riley v. BoehmMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Carlton v. HulettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Thomas v. Price ex rel. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Carlton v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wisconsin Steel Co. v. Maryland Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Wilson v. MolineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Ammon v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Walker v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Chandler v. RobinettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913