Carlton v. Carey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county by Isabella J. 'Carlton against Nebemiab Hulett. John E. Carey, administrator of tbe estate of said Nebemiab Hulett, was substituted as defendant. From an order, Moer, J., denying defendant’s motion for judgment in bis favor and granting1 plaintiff’s motion for judgment in ber favor, and from tbe judgment entered upon said order in favor of plaintiff, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Tbe substantial merits of tbis action were decided by tbis court upon a former appeal. See Carlton v. Hulett, 49 Minn. 308, 51 N. W. 1053, for a statement of tbe case, and tbe questions settled by that appeal. None of those questions can be reviewed on tbis appeal, and it must be accepted as a fact, in tbe -consideration of this appeal, that no title to tbe lots described in tbe complaint in tbis action passed from Nebemiab Hulett by bis .deed to tbe plaintiff’s husband.
After tbis case was remanded to tbe district court of St. Louis county, as a result of tbe former appeal, and on January 14,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carlton v. HulettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Doolittle v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Carlton v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Calhoun Beach Holding Co. v. Minneapolis Builders Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934