Legal Opinion

Garfield, R. v. EQT Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 2019No. 254 WDA 2019Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

J-A23026-19 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 ROBERT GARFIELD, ON BEHALF OF IN THE SUPERIOR COURT HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY OF SITUATED, PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. EQT CORP., Appellee No. 254 WDA 2019 Appeal from the Order Entered January 29, 2019 In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Civil Division at No(s): GD-17-14222 BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., KUNSELMAN, J., and MUSMANNO, J. MEMORANDUM BY BENDER, P.J.E.: FILED DECEMBER 6, 2019 Appellant, Robert Garfield, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, appeals from the trial court’s January…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  2. Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Dittman, B., Aplt. v. UPMCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Hill v. OfaltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Fishkin v. Hi-Acres, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API