Legal Opinion

Dittman, B., Aplt. v. UPMC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 2018No. 43 WAP 2017PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ.

OPINION

JUSTICE BAER

We granted discretionary review in this matter to determine whether an employer has a legal duty to use reasonable care to safeguard its employees' sensitive personal information that the employer stores on an internet-accessible computer system. We also examine the scope of Pennsylvania's economic loss doctrine, specifically whether it permits recovery in negligence for purely pecuniary damages. For the reasons discussed below, we hold that an employer has a legal duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. S. Cal. Gas Co. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.(In Re S. Cal. Gas Leak Cases)California Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Robin Baptiste v. Bethlehem Landfill CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. Bordoni v. Chase Home Fin. LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Baumbach, R. v. Lafayette CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API