Legal Opinion
Conoco Inc. v. Inman Oil Company, Inc. And Ronald C. Inman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 9, 1985No. 84-2221PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOL, Senior District Judge.
Conoco brought this diversity action against Inman Oil Company (Inman Oil) and Ronald C. Inman, individually, for recovery of monies due Conoco for petroleum products delivered to the defendants. At trial Inman Oil asserted eight counterclaims, including allegations of federal and state antitrust violations, tortious interference with business relationships, breach of contract and misrepresentations. The magistrate 1 ruled in favor of Conoco on all claims.
On appeal, Inman Oil contends the magistrate erred in holding (1) that Conoco did not violate the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Federal Trade Commission v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Janich Bros., Inc. v. The American Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Northeastern Telephone Company v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Amoco Oil Co. v. ErvinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Abcor Corporation James G. Kibler, Sr. v. Am International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- General Industries Corp. v. Hartz Mountain Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.