Francheska v. Jaganathan v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARC W. BROWN, Justice.
Appellant Francheska V. Jaganathan appeals the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress. Appellant alleges that the evidence was seized during an unlawful detention. Because the arresting officer lacked reasonable suspicion to detain appellant for violating the “Left Lane for Passing Only” sign, we conclude that the trial court committed harmful error when it denied appellant’s motion to suppress. We reverse and remand.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On the afternoon of June 5, 2010, appellant was driving east through Chambers County, Texas in the left…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Loserth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jaganathan, Francheska v.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Chidyausiku, Walter TendaiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Jaganathan, Francheska v.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Jaganathan, Francheska v.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Jaganathan, Francheska v.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.