Loserth v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Opinion of the Court · MeyersMeyers, Judge
in which McCORMICK, Presiding Judge, BAIRD, OVERSTREET, MANSFIELD, KELLER, PRICE and HOLLAND, Judges, joined.
We recently set forth the standard for courts of appeals’ review of trial courts’ rulings on motions to suppress evidence based upon Fourth Amendment claims. Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85 (Tex.Crim.App.1997). Today we hold that standard is applicable to review of a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress evidence based upon a claim that an in-court identification should not have been admitted due to taint by an impermissibly…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by478 opinions
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Ibarra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Charles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Gamboa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
473 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.