Legal Opinion

Honig v. Liddy

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1993No. Docket 141183PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

In this negligence action, plaintiff appeals as of right from an order of the Wayne Circuit Court that granted defendants’ motion for summary disposition, brought pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7). The trial court held that plaintiffs action was barred by the expiration of the period of limitation. We agree and affirm.

Plaintiff 1 suffered a head injury in a horse-riding accident on March 7, 1987. According to an affidavit filed in opposition to defendants’ motion, "at least through May of 1987, [plaintiff] was not yet capable of functioning with the cognitive abilities attendant to her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. JustinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Geisland v. CsutorasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Kelly v. RichmondMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. English Ex Rel. English v. BousamraDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998
  2. Vance v. Henry Ford Health SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Vega v. Lakeland Hospitals at Niles and St Joseph, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API