First Nat. Bank of Atlanta, Tex. v. Thomas

This case was before us, on appeal, in Í929. It is reported in 168 La. 481, 122 So. 5S9. The ease is stated in that opinion and it is not necessary to restate it here.

On the first appeal all of the issues were disposed of except one of fact, upon proof of which the proper decision of the ease hinged. On the first trial the lower court excluded proof of the character of defendants’ possession of the property after the expiration of the redemptive period fixed in the deed of sale. In our opinion, this ruling was erroneous, and we remanded the case for the admission of proof of that fact. On the…