Legal Opinion

Wait v. Pearson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1956No. 4218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

This is an action in boundary. Plaintiffs appeal from judgment which fixed the eastern boundary of their land, not on the governmental quarter-section line per their record title, but as along an ancient fence about 200 feet west thereof (i. e., 200' within their land per record title).

The question herein is whether an ancient fence lying within land sold by a seller can constitute as against the immediate purchaser a visible boundary separating the contiguous estates created by the sale, when such fence fails to accord with the ideal boundary line of the tract the seller…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Opdenwyer v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Arnold v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  3. Williams v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  4. Henly v. KaskLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Succession of ZebriskaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sessum v. HemperleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  2. Sessum v. HemperleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. Watson v. Crown-Zellerbach Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API