Jackson v. Lemle
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Fifth. District Court, Parish of Ouachita. Iliohardson, J. 1. After the delay granted in a vente a remere has elapsed, whether the act be considered as such or a common law mortgage, unless fraud or want of consideration or novation be shown, the vendee’s title is unassailable.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Fifth. District Court, Parish of Ouachita. Iliohardson, J. 1. After the delay granted in a vente a remere has elapsed, whether the act be considered as such or a common law mortgage, unless fraud or want of consideration or novation be shown, the vendee’s title is unassailable. Hearnan vs. Glades, 2D An.; W. R. Longue, 638. 2. A contract by which a plantation is sold for a sum which the vendor agrees to advance in yearly instalments to the vendee for the cultivation of the property sold, with a stipulation that the vendee promises to reconvey the plantation to the vendor on…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Todd, J.
The plaintiff, alleging himself the owner of the land described in his petition, that he had once transferred it to Lemle, one of the defendants, as security for a debt which he, plaintiff, had after-wards paid, alleging also his possession of the land, and that Lemle was attempting to sell it to Mrs. Seal, the other defendant, asked for and obtained an injunction restraining Lemle from putting Mrs. Seal in possession of the land, and the latter from taking possession of it, and asked to he decreed the owner of the property, etc.
Lemle, after…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Latiolais v. BreauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Breaux v. RoyerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Milliken v. BarrowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1895
- Jolivet v. ChavesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Rion v. ReevesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.