Legal Opinion

MCI Worldcom, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 2004No. 1 EAP 2002PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

This is an appeal from an en banc decision of the Commonwealth Court that affirmed the order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) setting rates for access to Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.’s network for local telephone service. Appellant, MCI WorldCom, Inc. (“WorldCom”), presents issues regarding the propriety of the rates set by the PUC. Before we may reach those substantive issues, however, the threshold issue of whether federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over such disputes must be addressed. As we find that jurisdiction over state commission…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Bilt-Rite Contractors, Inc. v. Architectural StudioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Martin v. DOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. VeonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. McGrory v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API