Legal Opinion

McGrory v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2007No. 48 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

This appeal presents the narrow issue of whether appellant, the Department of Transportation (PennDOT), had independent authority under the Ignition Interlock Law, 42 Pa.C.S. § 7003 (since repealed), to enforce the ignition interlock requirement on drivers convicted of a second or subsequent offense of driving under the influence (DUI) in instances *59where the trial court failed to impose the interlock requirement in its sentencing order.1 The Commonwealth Court panel below followed a series of decisions from that court, heretofore not reviewed by this Court, which…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. MockaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. In Re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of Nov. 4, 2003 General ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Ramich v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. GriffithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. Giulian v. Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API