Legal Opinion

Eyre v. Beebe

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action to set aside as fraudulent and void, an assignment for the benefit of creditors.

1Opinion of the CourtCrerke, J.

I. Without asserting that the statute of limitations is or is not properly pleaded, it is sufficient to say that the cause of action in this case did not accrue until after the recovery of the judgment and the return of the execution in the common law action' against the defendant Beebe. The plaintiff could not commence this action until such proceedings were taken and consummated. He had no right to commence it, and, therefore, no right of action *335accrued. Six years had not elapsed from the return of the execution in the former action before this was commenced.

II. Did the conduct and acts of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Turner v. JaycoxNew York Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mickel v. WalravenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Somers v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Dorian v. DorianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Weaver v. HavilandNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Wooldridge v. IrvingUnited States Circuit Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API