Legal Opinion

Mickel v. Walraven

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 26, 1894PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from Clinton District Court. — Hon.P.B. Wolee* Judge. Suit by creditors’ bill to set aside certain conveyances of real and personal property, alleged to be in fraud of creditors. Decree dismissing plaintiff’s petition, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

I. John Walraven and Mary O. Walraven are husband and wife; the other defendants are their sons. In the year 1873, and for some years prior thereto, they lived together as one family, in *424Clinton county,. Iowa. In the early seventies defendant John Walraven failed in business, and among his creditors was the plaintiff. Plaintiff obtained judgment against John Walraven on his claim, in the district court of Clinton county on the fifteenth day of September, 1891. He procured an execution to issue on this judgment, which was returned “No property found,” before the commencement of this suit. In…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Prescott v. GonserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. Baker v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Hintrager v. HennessySupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Bergh v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Dennis v. BintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Donaldson v. JacobitzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. E. B. Piekenbrock & Sons v. KnoerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Brundage v. CheneworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API