Legal Opinion

Dorian v. Dorian

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 22, 1924No. 12058PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

'This defendant' in error, 'as plaintiff below, instituted this action for the partition of certain lands situated in Garfield county, alleging that she and one Stephen Dorian were''married-' in 1891, and that Stephen Dorian died' August' ' 8, 1917, leaving surviving him as 'his - ¡sole heirs the defendant in error, Mary Dorián, and the plaintiffs in error, who are brothers and sisters of Stephen .Doriqn. ..The defendants filed an apswér adniittjpg. that Mary Dorian and Stephen .Dorian..'were married in 1891, and that Stephéñ'"Dorián died intestate- August 8, 1917, but 'alleging that, at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ballew v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Cordray v. CordraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Crombie v. LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Morgan v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Tolbert v. State Bank of PadenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Simonton v. SimontonIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Burns v. Pittsburg Mortgage Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Oliver v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Robinson v. RockettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API