Rhodes v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHabbis, J.
Whatever rules the railroad company promulgates concerning the insurance of its employees are a part of the contract of insurance and are, stating the rule broadly, as binding upon the parties as any other provisions in the contract: Independent Foresters v. Keliher, 36 Or. 501, 510 (59 Pac. 324, 1109, 60 Pac. 563, 78 Am. St. Rep. 785). The plaintiff invokes this general doctrine and says that Rule 11 is a part of the contract; and then after making Rule 11 a part of the contract the plaintiff argues that Addie M. "Walker was ineligible and that the designation of her as the beneficiary was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Murphy v. NowakIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Titsworth v. TitsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Woodmen of the World v. RutledgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Modern Woodmen of America v. ComeauxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Hall v. AllenMississippi Supreme Court · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Northern Life Ins. Co. v. BurkholderOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Dyer v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Roberts v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Northern Life Insurance v. BurkholderOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Northern Life Insurance v. BurkholderOregon Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.