Legal Opinion
Cautilli v. GAF Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 12, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-2835PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDWARD R. BECKER, District Judge.
This memorandum considers the sufficiency of a pleading alleging a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The question arises on the Rule 12(b)(6) motion of defendant GAF Corporation, former employer of plaintiff Philip Cautilli to dismiss the fifth count of the above-captioned complaint. We turn first to a description of the plaintiff’s well-pleaded facts, all of which we take as true for the purpose of ruling on the motion.
Sometime around October 1, 1978, plaintiff entered the employ of defendant as a chemist in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Jones v. Nissenbaum, Rudolph & SeidnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Forster v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- John H. Cox v. Keystone Carbon Company, Richard Reuscher and William ReuscherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Rinehimer v. Luzerne County Community CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Clark v. Township of FallsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Fregara v. Jet Aviation Business JetsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Madreperla v. Williard Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.