Legal Opinion

State v. Horsley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 2000No. 9508-36545; CA A102921PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals an amended judgment of conviction on one count of robbery in the second degree. He challenges the trial court’s authority to amend the judgment to add a term of post-prison supervision to his sentence. We affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Defendant was convicted for a crime that he committed in August 1995. The trial court imposed a sentence of 70 months’ imprisonment, pursuant to Ballot Measure 11 (1994), codified at ORS 137.700(2)(a)(R). Although the applicable sentencing guidelines require a term of post-prison supervision on a conviction for second-degree…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LeathersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. CottonOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. PinkowskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. EastonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. LavitskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Stroup v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API