Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1999No. 95-0730; CA A92684PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*260EDMONDS, J.

The state appeals from a judgment imposing sentence under the sentencing guidelines on two counts of second-degree robbeiy. ORS 164.405. The sentencing court vacated the original judgment that had imposed the 70-month minimum sentences mandated by Measure 11 and imposed instead 12-month sentences under the guidelines.1 The state argues that the court had no authority to vacate the original judgment and to resentence defendant at a time when defendant was serving the sentences under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Corrections Division and had an appeal pending before this court. We…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DeCampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. LeathersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State Ex Rel. O'Leary v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HorsleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. LebeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API