Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1925No. 3 Div. 710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

This bill was filed by a stockholder in the Mid-Texas Petroleum Corporation to have advantage of the Act of 1919, p. 946. Its general equity as a bill on behalf of defrauded stockholders is sustained by the decision in National Surety Co. v. Graves, 211 Ala. 533, 101 So. 190. But this court, in National Surety Co. v. Morgan, 211 Ala. 360, 100 So. 462, held that the statute of limitation of one year, provided by the Act of 1919 and by the substitutionary Act of 1920, p. 60, applied in a ease circumstanced as this, and complainant, seeking to avoid the bar of the statute, amended his bill, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yniestra v. TarletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Swaney v. County of GageNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. National Surety Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Porter v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. City of South Omaha v. McGavockNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meeks v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Roquemore v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Maulitz v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Thomas v. Fidelity Casualty Co. of N. Y.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Pounds v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API