Roquemore v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.

FOSTER, Justice.

One of the contentions on this appeal is that the motion as amended does not show that appellant collected the money claimed hy the movant as an attorney, and that therefore the summary remedy provided by section 10267, Oode, does not apply.

The rule in this respect was stated over a hundred years ago by an English court as follows: “Where an attorney is employed in a matter wholly unconnected with his professional character, the court will not interfere in a summary way to compel him to execute faithfully the trust reposed in him. But where tlie employment is so connected with…