Richmond Guano Co. v. Walston
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
Plaintiff brought an action against tbe defendants, wbo gave a negotiable note 23 February, 1921, to Tomlinson Guano Company, due 1 November, 1921, witb interest from 1 January, 1921. Credit $150, 22 November, 1921. Plaintiff claimed it was tbe owner in due course. As a defense to tbe note, defendants allege tbat tbey stored witb Tomlinson Guano Company, or Tomlinson & Co., Inc., 79% bales of cotton upon certain terms to be sold and applied on tbe note. Tbis was not recited in tbe note. Tbey further allege tbat Tomlinson Guano Company, or Tomlinson & Co., Inc., were one and tbe same concern.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kellogg v. Douglas County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- Hendrix v. Bauhard Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Dillard v. Farmers Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Robinson v. LairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Dunham v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adolph Ramish, Inc. v. WoodruffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Cristina v. MattenbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Hoosier Mutual Insurance v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929