Legal Opinion

In Re Green Grand Jury Proceedings

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 20, 2007No. 06-3938, 06-4030PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

The district court 1 granted in part and denied in part the government’s motion to compel the production of documents and an attorney’s testimony before a federal grand jury. The government appeals that portion of the district court’s order denying its motion to compel. The client cross-appeals, contesting the order insofar as it granted the motion. We affirm.

I

In light of the need to observe the requirements of grand jury secrecy, we will provide only a basic recitation of the facts. In the course of earlier, unrelated proceedings, the client was the target of an…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In Re: Grand Jury v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. Under Seal 1 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  3. Bear v. Cuna Mutual GroupDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
  4. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Gs and FsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. In Re 2015–2016 Jefferson County Grand JurySupreme Court of Colorado · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API