In Re Green Grand Jury Proceedings
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
The district court 1 granted in part and denied in part the government’s motion to compel the production of documents and an attorney’s testimony before a federal grand jury. The government appeals that portion of the district court’s order denying its motion to compel. The client cross-appeals, contesting the order insofar as it granted the motion. We affirm.
I
In light of the need to observe the requirements of grand jury secrecy, we will provide only a basic recitation of the facts. In the course of earlier, unrelated proceedings, the client was the target of an…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re: Grand Jury v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Under Seal 1 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Bear v. Cuna Mutual GroupDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Gs and FsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- In Re 2015–2016 Jefferson County Grand JurySupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.