Legal Opinion

Erie City's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1929No. Appeal, 99PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

In its natural surroundings, Mill Creek, winding its way through the City of Erie, was doubtless a thing of beauty; but, as the city grew, it became less and less desirable, and in the great rainfall of August 3, 1915, (to quote from appellees’ brief) “the waters of the creek, together with a quantity of debris, cumulated at the 26th Street bridge......forming a dam, causing the water to back up and finally burst through the bridge and sweep down the bed and valley of Mill Creek, causing the loss of about a score of lives and great property damage, both public…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Wheeler v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  3. Hammett v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  4. Washington AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  5. Morewood AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pew TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Schuetz's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Welsch v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Knox v. Georgia-Pacific Plywood CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  5. Commonwealth v. Spisak, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API