State v. Walker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, J.
Defendant’s motions for judgment of nonsuit were properly-overruled. While there must be a taking and carrying away of the personal property of another to complete the crime of larceny, it is not necessary that the property be completely removed from the premises of the owner. “The least removal of an article, from the •actual or constructive possession of the owner, so as to be under the control of the felon, will be a sufficient asportation.” State v. Jones, 65 N.C. 395, 397. Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence permits an inference that defendant removed the rings…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- People v. LardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. . SterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. FronebergerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. JacquithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.