Legal Opinion
In Re Barlow
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 1929No. 5504PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WM. E. LEE, J. —
The supreme court having jurisdiction to review on appeal decisions of the district courts in habeas corpus proceedings (In re Jennings, 46 Ida. 142, 267 Pac. 227) will not exercise its power (Const., art. 5, sec. 9; C. S., sec. 9275) to grant an original writ of habeas corpus except in extraordinary eases. (In re Burnette, 73 Kan. 609, 85 Pac. 575; Ex parte Shaw, 7 Ohio St. 81, 70 Am. Dec. 55; Ex parte Shean, 25 Ohio St. 440; State v. Wolfer, 127 Minn. 102, 148 N. W. 896, L. R. A. 1915B, 95; Ex parte Lynn, 19 Tex. App. 120; Ex parte Japan, 36 Tex. Crim. 48, 38 S. W. 43; Ex…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CurrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Ex Parte NaborsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
- State ex rel. Murphy v. WolferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Phillip Lewis Lindquist v. Darrol Gardner, Warden, Idaho State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Ex parte ValdezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Reyes v. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.