Legal Opinion

Phillip Lewis Lindquist v. Darrol Gardner, Warden, Idaho State Correctional Institution

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1985No. 84-4254PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.

On appeal from dismissal of appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, the issue is whether he exhausted his state judicial remedies by presenting his claim to the Idaho Supreme Court in an original habeas proceeding. We conclude that the district court was correct in determining that he failed to exhaust.

FACTS

In 1976, a jury convicted pro se appellant Phillip Lindquist of first degree murder in Idaho state court. The trial court sentenced him to death under Idaho’s mandatory death penalty statute, Idaho Code § 18-4004. On appeal, the Idaho Supreme Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sweet v. CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Dionne v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Still v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Re BarlowIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Michael Ponce Tacho v. Joe MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Vernon Reiger, Sr. v. Robert Christensen and Tany S. HongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Ionatana Tamapua v. Edwin Shimoda and the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Mark Hayes v. Larry KincheloeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Nathan Kevin Turner v. Joseph Compoy, Warden, Attorney of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API